WordPress co-founder's e-government work

So many new websites appearing at the moment, you’d think it was the end of the financial year or something. The new DIUS site is very pretty, although I hear it wasn’t cheap. There’s a new site for the Ministry of Justice, which (if I’m totally honest) feels a bit dated, and clearly has several rough edges still to be smoothed. The new Parliament site looks really fresh and welcoming, putting its WordPress-powered news function front and centre… although when it comes to Hansard, probably its primary raison d’etre, it still can’t come close to TheyWorkForYou. I’m not particularly fond of the new Civil Service site overall, but it’s good to see them trying some new things.
But one launch you may well have missed amongst all these big splashes is the Law Commission’s consultation site. It doesn’t look much, but it’s notable because:

  • it’s been done on WordPress, slotted seamlessly into a site which more typically relies on PDF files (!).
  • it also includes a discussion forum running on WordPress’s sister project, bbPress; not as common as you might think. And
  • it’s the work of Mike Little – the WordPress founder who isn’t Matt Mullenweg.

Having met him at last year’s WordCamp, I introduced Mike to a few government people last year, and I know he’s been doing a few WordPress jobs with Whitehall clients – but this is the first one (I think?) where he’s gone on record to take his credit. So I can finally say how fantastic it is to have him on the team, as it were, further adding to the credibility of WordPress in the government space… and I’m hoping we can find a few opportunities to work together.

2 thoughts on “WordPress co-founder's e-government work”

  1. What a curious site – truly, you’d barely know it’s WordPress. Why restrict commenting to logged in registered WP users though?

  2. Simon, thanks for the mention. It is the first I’ve blogged about. There should be an announcement concerning another soon (Steph’s seen some of it) and I shouldn’t talk about the other one 🙁
    Steph, that is how the client wanted it. The commentable document and forum are moderated too (by a small team), which may hold back the conversation. They are very cautious, but are pleased so far.

Comments are closed.