Skip to content

Puffbox

Simon Dickson's gov-tech blog, active 2005-14. Because permalinks.

2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005

Code For The People company e-government news politics technology Uncategorised

api award barackobama barcampukgovweb bbc bis blogging blogs bonanza borisjohnson branding broaderbenefits buddypress budget cabinetoffice careandsupport chrischant civilservice coi commentariat commons conservatives consultation coveritlive crimemapping dailymail datasharing datastandards davidcameron defra democracy dfid directgov dius downingstreet drupal engagement facebook flickr foi foreignoffice francismaude freedata gds google gordonbrown governanceofbritain govuk guardian guidofawkes health hosting innovation internetexplorer labourparty libdems liveblog lynnefeatherstone maps marthalanefox mashup microsoft MPs mysociety nhs onepolitics opensource ordnancesurvey ournhs parliament petitions politics powerofinformation pressoffice puffbox rationalisation reshuffle rss simonwheatley skunkworks skynews statistics stephenhale stephgray telegraph toldyouso tomloosemore tomwatson transparency transport treasury twitter typepad video walesoffice wordcamp wordcampuk wordpress wordupwhitehall youtube

Privacy Policy

  • X
  • Link
  • LinkedIn
  • 6 Dec 2011
    e-government, technology
    petitions

    Petitions: credit where it's due

    Last month, the GDS blog published details of the traffic levels experienced by the new government e-petitions service in its first 100 days:

    At what price? Well, that came out soon afterwards, in a PQ to the Leader of the House.

    The Government’s e-petition site was designed and created by the Government Digital Service, in conjunction with the Office of the Leader of the House of Commons, at a cost of £80,700. The projected technical running cost for the first three years of operation is £32,000 per annum.

    – which works out, very roughly, at just over around 1p per ‘transaction’ (ie petition signature). The traffic numbers were impressive in and of themselves, but it’s this calculation which matters more. A hearty ‘well done’ to the GDS team. Now, it’s over to the politicians to do something meaningful with the petitions…?

    Responses

    1. Ben Griffiths
      6 Dec 2011

      As my maths teacher would have no doubt said: show your workings!
      So – £176,700 for three years (£80,700 + £32,000 x 3)
      That’s £16,073 (ish) for 100 days.
      If the signature run-rate continues – £16,073 per 2,600,000 signatures
      Or 0.6p (ish) per transaction.
      That makes the figure quite a bit under 1p per transaction – including the set up cost.
      Or, in terms of run-rate, even better:
      £96,000 for three years. £8,760 for 100 days/ 2.6m signatures. Or 0.33p per signature.
      Of course, check my sums – your workings might be different.

    2. Simon
      6 Dec 2011

      Actually, I think Ben’s calculation is closer to the mark than mine was. Humble apologies to my maths teacher (if he’s still with us).

    3. Pete Herlihy (@yahoo_pete)
      6 Dec 2011

      Thanks for the comments Simon….. Re: the costs, I settled on an ongoing figure of about 0.5p per signature – based on the fact that we will continue to invest and evolve this product…. so let’s meet in the middle 🙂

    4. Dave
      7 Dec 2011

      I wonder whether we’re measuring the wrong thing.
      I can see 5 now @ > 100k, whose titles are:
      Convicted London rioters should loose (sic) all benefits
      Full disclosure of all government documents relating to 1989 Hillsborough disaster
      No to 70 million
      CHEAPER PETROL AND DIESEL
      Make financial education a compulsory part of the school curriculum
      Are we still proud of ourselves ??!
      Is each of these enlightening ideas worth 20K? Arguably not.
      3 of them could be covered by buying a copy of the Daily Mail which I’m guessing is under a quid.
      A bit further down we have neck and neck suggestions to restore, then retain the ban on capital punishment. And there, I’d suggest, lies the problem.

    5. Julia
      11 Dec 2011

      And is anyone hat tipping the creators of the original government epetitions site? I honestly can’t remember who was behind it, but surely it went some way towards proving the concept – and therefore should be credited with helping to reduce some of the design process? All I’ve read so far tells the story of this GDS service in isolation.

Proudly Powered by WordPress