Skip to content

Puffbox

Simon Dickson's gov-tech blog, active 2005-14. Because permalinks.

2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005

Code For The People company e-government news politics technology Uncategorised

api award barackobama barcampukgovweb bbc bis blogging blogs bonanza borisjohnson branding broaderbenefits buddypress budget cabinetoffice careandsupport chrischant civilservice coi commentariat commons conservatives consultation coveritlive crimemapping dailymail datasharing datastandards davidcameron defra democracy dfid directgov dius downingstreet drupal engagement facebook flickr foi foreignoffice francismaude freedata gds google gordonbrown governanceofbritain govuk guardian guidofawkes health hosting innovation internetexplorer labourparty libdems liveblog lynnefeatherstone maps marthalanefox mashup microsoft MPs mysociety nhs onepolitics opensource ordnancesurvey ournhs parliament petitions politics powerofinformation pressoffice puffbox rationalisation reshuffle rss simonwheatley skunkworks skynews statistics stephenhale stephgray telegraph toldyouso tomloosemore tomwatson transparency transport treasury twitter typepad video walesoffice wordcamp wordcampuk wordpress wordupwhitehall youtube

Privacy Policy

  • X
  • Link
  • LinkedIn
  • 16 Aug 2007
    e-government

    Are you watching, COI?

    Hello, 70 Whitehall! The FT reports that COI’s media monitoring unit is considering how to extend its coverage to the blogosphere. Hardly a surprise, but I suppose it’s another endorsement of the importance of the new channels, particularly in politics. According to MMU director Clarence Mitchell: ‘There’s a whole level of debate taking place online which simply didn’t exist before and departments feel they need to be fully engaged in that.’ When he says ‘several were taken increasingly seriously within government’, one wonders which. Apart from the obvious couple.

    Incidentally, having been (I thought) quite nice about Iain Dale yesterday, I have to say his summary of the FT piece is pretty slanted, and not exactly accurate.

    The Financial Times reports that the government is about to set up a ‘blog monitoring unit’ (I kid you not).

    No, Iain, you do kid us. It’s not a new unit being set up, it’s an existing unit thinking about expanding its remit. And besides, as you proudly point out on regular occasions, political stories frequently break online, then find their way into the mainstream media – so it’s probably doing exactly the same job, just a day earlier. And anyway, what’s the alternative – ignore the blogosphere? How often do I read posts complaining that the government isn’t listening to ordinary people outside the Westminster Village? Sheesh, you just can’t win.

    Responses

    1. Colin McKay
      17 Aug 2007

      “The blog monitoring would need a sufficient number of individual government departments to agree to cover the extra costs involved. If this happened, MMU estimates a service could operate by the end of the year.”
      Why does this feel like a too traditional approach to media monitoring? How many departments have already cobbled together their own blog and internet monitoring functions, using Web 2.0 apps and other freebies?
      Is the media monitoring all centralized in the U.K. government, or do individual departments have their own media monitoring teams as well, to supplement the COI’s service?
      That’s the model we follow in Canada.

    2. Dale’s Criticism of British Government’s Blog Monitoring Unit Off-Base at notes from across the pond
      17 Aug 2007

      […] advocate, architect and blogger, Simon Dickson, follows up: What’s the alternative – ignore the blogosphere? How often do I read posts complaining that the […]

Proudly Powered by WordPress