Simon Dickson has been blogging about online government, politics and WordPress since 2005.
Some important people read it.

 
 

Archive for 'twitter'


Monday 20 July 2009

Congratulations @downingstreet

1000000

It doesn't matter how they got there, and it doesn't matter if a significant proportion are spammy. The @downingstreet Twitter account hit one million followers on Sunday afternoon - making it surely the biggest e-government hit in a couple of years at least. At zero setup cost. And zero marketing spend.

The question is - still - what do we do with them all?

For anyone needing background, here's an easy link to all the posts I've written on the subject. To anyone I met WordCamp who's reading this: check out the URL construction. Did you know you could do that??

Comments: 4

Thursday 9 July 2009

Breaking news: minister tweets

It's just a small thing; but for the first time this morning, I noticed a Twitter message prompting a 'BREAKING NEWS' 'strap' on Sky News TV. Specifically, culture secretary Ben Bradshaw's tweet about the Andy Coulson phone tapping thing (sent, I notice, from 'mobile web').

Now I don't know if Sky were tipped off via conventional channels that the Minister was going to tweet something significant; or if it was picked up by the Press Association first... that's usually where Sky's breaking news straps come from. Sky's Millbank studio should probably be keeping an eye out for precisely this sort of thing, but I don't know if they are yet. It doesn't really matter how it got there, though: there it was, word for word, on my TV screen, and being read out by the presenter. That's the kind of media coverage press releases just don't get.

Press officers in government, you'd better get into the social web thing before your minister does.

Comments: 1

Monday 23 March 2009

No10's Twitter status worth $250,000?

By getting involved early and enthusiastically in the whole Twitter thing, has DowningStreet earned itself $250,000 of free digital engagement? Well-known internet entrepreneur Jason Calacanis (number of followers: 63,000) has offered Twitter a cool quarter of a million bucks - as I believe our American friends would describe it - to secure himself a two-year stay on their list of people you might like to follow when you open a new account. This is, of course, the same list which has done so much to boost DowningStreet's follower count, now standing at 276,000.

There's breathless excitement in a piece on TechCrunch:

[Calacanis] wants to lock in the price now because he thinks it is a great marketing opportunity. It is not unusual for people on the suggested list to gain 10,000 new followers every day. That comes to 3.6 million a year, and even if half unsubscribe, that is still a direct channel to more than a million potential customers. Those are customers who feel a connection with you because of the personal nature of Twitter messages.

There's additional detail in John Naughton's piece from yesterday's Observer:

"I was only half-bluffing with this move," he wrote in his weekly newsletter. "I was 90% sure Twitter wouldn't take the money and I wouldn't have to pony up .... However, if they did call my bluff ... I would have gotten what I wanted: two to 10 million Twitter followers and the ability to drive one to two million visits to Mahalo a month from Twitter."

This is a serious entrepreneur, a guy who has made serious money from the internet, reckoning that $120,000 for one year, or $250,000 to cover himself for the likely price rise in year two, was good value to buy something which 10 Downing Street already owns. One wonders, then, whether Francis Maude might want to reconsider his comments about No10's experimentation with 'the latest digital gimmicks'?

Add a comment

Tuesday 24 February 2009

Putting Google geo-location to the Twitter test

Google's javascript API has an exciting, and somewhat underreported little feature built in: each time a call is initiated, it attempts to establish where the browser is physically located - and reports back a town, 'region' (county) and country. I was wondering if it was accurate enough to be used to 'personalise' a website automatically: so I ran a quick experiment among my Twitter following.

I set up a quick test page on puffbox.com, which included a call to the Google API, and asked people to leave a comment as to whether or not the response was accurate. Within an hour I'd had 30 responses, from all around the UK.

The results revealed that the function is sometimes bang-on, sometimes blocked, sometimes curious, and sometimes plain wrong... occasionally by hundreds of miles. I can forgive the occasional placing of towns in the wrong county; but several people in the north of England, using the same ISP also located up north, were getting responses of 'London'. So my conclusion, disappointingly, is that it's not really good enough to make meaningful use of.

A wasted effort? Hardly. It actually saves me the effort of building something reliant on the geo function, only to discover it's useless for large numbers of people. And it's a nice case study for the value of Twitter: a crowd of good folk and true, located all over the country, from whom I could ask a 5-second favour... with a good expectation of getting responses. Thanks, team.

Add a comment

Saturday 21 February 2009

@downingst hits 100k Twitter fans

Entirely predictably, the Downing Street Twitter channel broke new ground at some time on Friday night, registering its 100,000th follower. To put this extraordinary growth in some perspective: one month ago, they had just 12,000. And just one week ago, they had 50,000. In relative terms, for now at least, they're now comfortably settled into Twitterholic's top 30 - ahead of MC Hammer, ahead of Philip Schofield, far ahead of Chris Moyles, and far, far ahead of Russell Brand (sorry Guido).

There seem to be two streams of criticism of Twitter, in terms of 'serious' usage: one, there's no evidence of any tangible benefit (see Thomas Gensemer in the Guardian this week); and two, there's no evidence of a Twitter business model. (Yet and yet, of course.)

Personally, I take a more positive view. Very few MPs have serious numbers of followers - there are only two political offices in the world with any kind of substantial Twitter following: Barack Obama and 10 Downing Street. The former didn't do too badly out of it, did he? - although if you look back at the Obama tweeting, it's frankly a bit rubbish. My guess is, it helped further his image as being hip to this sort of thing, and that was enough. Number10, meanwhile, do a surprising amount at a micro level - you might be surprised how many replies they send to ordinary punters, to their surprise and (often) delight.

And you know what? Even if there's no future business model, we're looking at a phenomenal opportunity here, today. The fact it may not be here tomorrow shouldn't stop us exploiting it while it's there. 100,000 people have signed up - actively, voluntarily - to hear from the heart of UK government. Now they're actually listening, what should we be saying to them?

Comments: 5

Friday 20 February 2009

Barely a third of Tweeting is via the website

Some fascinating data published on Techcrunch reveals the usage patterns behind Twitter. Less than a third of updates (I think that's what they're measuring?), just 32% are posted via the web interface. The two leading Adobe Air-based clients, Tweetdeck and Twhirl, account for 23% between them; Twitterfeed's automated RSS postings put it fourth, ahead of (wow!) a paid-for iPhone app, Tweetie. And although Twitter doesn't seem an entirely natural fit with most Blackberry users, Twitterberry is at no6.

I see all sorts of implications in this ranking: the fact that a clear majority of use of 'a website' isn't via the web, showing what good things can happen when you offer an API; an endorsement of Adobe Air's cross-platform approach, coupled (potentially) with Air's relative friendliness to the less technical, more creative developer; and the fact that people really are prepared to pay actual cash for something like Tweetie, when there are perfectly decent alternatives (like Twitterfon or Twitterrific) in the iPhone app store. (And for the record: two of the top five are UK-based - Tweetdeck and Twitterfeed.)

Comments: 2

Wednesday 11 February 2009

David Lammy, Twitter expert

Lammy meets Brandreth

It came as a bit of a shock this evening, when BBC1's The One Show started talking about Twitter, that reporter Gyles Brandreth's first port of call was Kingsgate House on Victoria Street, home of DIUS and minister David Lammy. With traffic up by a factor of three this year already, Twitter's certainly a hot topic at the moment - with the BBC in particular facing accusations of going overboard; but where does David Lammy come into all this?

To be entirely fair, Lammy did talk (some of) the talk:

For me, it's almost a broadcast means of people knowing what I'm up to during the course of the day. It is about finding ways in which people can be clearer about what government ministers are up to.

OK, so it would have been nice if he'd described it as a two-way thing - and of course, he may well have done, but that wasn't the soundbite we heard. But nice to get the potential for political transparency on the record.

The only niggle is that Lammy has been a member of the Twitter family since mid-December. He hasn't even reached three figures for the number of tweets. Indeed, he's only been using it with any head of steam for a month. One can't help feeling it was a nice 'soft' primetime TV appearance for a politician with ambition: the caption read 'Minister, Dept for Innovation', and it can't have done any harm to put a government minister in a story about something 'cutting edge' and 'cool'.

Speaking of Twitter: I see @downingstreet has now reached the Twitterholic Top 50, and looks like going even higher - they've already passed the MarsPhoenix Lander, one of Twitter's iconic accounts. Between you and me, I'm told they have MC Hammer in their sights.

Add a comment

Saturday 24 January 2009

No10 leaps into Twitter's top 100

Twitterholic data shows No10's explosive growth in the last fortnight

Twitterholic data shows No10's explosive growth in the last fortnight

One of the biggest successes in e-government this past year, and arguably one of the most surprising, is Downing Street's use of Twitter. And thanks to a remarkable couple of weeks, the Prime Minister's Office now finds itself in the Top 100 of the most followed Twitter accounts worldwide, as ranked (fairly reliably) by Twitterholic.com.

It's been a model of social media usage. The account was first publicised (here, by me) almost exactly ten months ago: the initial tweets were, as with a lot of corporates, automated via the Twitterfeed service. But within a week, they were beginning to talk like 'proper' users; nowadays, of course, it's perfectly normal for them to reply to comments and queries from other users - who seem genuinely stunned that someone at No1o is listening. It's often been quoted as an example of best practice - and this week, I've seen several people (eg the influential Mashable blog) suggesting the Obama White House should use it as its model.

Growth in the number of followers has been steady rather than spectacular - until earlier this month, when things went into overdrive. Just ten days ago, they had just over 8,000 followers; the Twitterholic number quoted for today is more than double that... putting them at #96 in the world. But as I write this, the @downingstreet Twitter page reports a follower count in excess of 19,000 - enough to put them even higher in the rankings tomorrow, leaping ahead of internet 'big names' like Loic Le Meur, Dave Winer and Zefrank. (And even, dare i even say it, @wordpress!) Any higher, and you're into serious celebrity territory.

When you see a chart looking like that, you're inevitably trying to think what could possibly be causing it. I'm not aware of any rational explanation myself... and a quick scan of recent followers doesn't suggest an influx of spam accounts. (Well, no more than usual.)

I can only offer a couple of suggestions:

  • The Obama effect. There's been a lot of speculation about what Team O might do with whitehouse.gov - and maybe that's stimulated interest in what's happening elsewhere. (I have to say though, the Canadian and Australian PMs haven't seen anything like the same growth.)
  • In the wake of Stephen Fry, Jonathan Ross and John Cleese - Brits are waking up to Twitter. Hitwise published data last week claiming Twitter's UK-based website traffic (never mind other usage methods) was up 10-fold in a year, with - by the look of it - a further acceleration in the last few weeks. I guess the PM's Office has made it into that category of Famous UK People You Should Follow When You Join: certainly if you look at the most recent followers, a lot of them are new Twitter users, and @downingstreet is among their first handful of follows. 

It's truly an amazing success story: and the secret is simple - it's playing by the (evolving) rules of the medium. The No10 web team post a range of stuff: what they described earlier this week as 'information mixed with colour' - same as every good Twitterer does. Sometimes it's important government stuff; sometimes it's the 'what I had for breakfast' of Twitter stereotyping. They ask for feedback; they respond to questions, where they can. There's no lengthy clearance process; they trust the guys to be sensible, and it's a policy that has worked. The fact that it's all kept anonymous, and the fact that it isn't actually the PM himself (and they make no secret of that), have not hindered things.

Now, with all those people listening, what would you do with them?

Comments: 4

Wednesday 14 January 2009

Parliament's Twitter backchannel

Twitter backchannel

From Cabinet Office questions and PMQs today... and that's before the debate on Segways tonight. So we're to assume that the nation's MPs were catching up on some serious geek time over the Christmas break then?

(Background pic from uk_parliament at Flickr)

Comments: 2

Tuesday 26 August 2008

Another reason to use Twitter

I've recently noticed people's Twitter accounts ranking particularly highly on search results for their name. So is the benefit to your search engine ranking good enough reason to get into Twitter, even just as a token gesture?

For example, I run an experimental Twitter account for Puffbox: it's just a Twitterfeed thing for blog posts specifically about the company. It only has a handful of subscribers, and I'm neither offended nor surprised. But it's ranking remarkably highly on Google searches for 'puffbox': at present, it's number #3, beneath two results for puffbox.com itself. Setting up a new Twitter account takes seconds; setting up a Twitterfeed something similar; and once it's up and running, that's job done.

Of course, a one-way Twitter account isn't going to win you many plaudits, or indeed many followers. But if it pushes your content up the appropriate search rankings, for zero cost and zero day-to-day (or even month-to-month) effort, surely it's worth doing? The choice of a sensible, search-term friendly username seems to be the most important factor; but don't forget to add meaningful 'personal' information to your profile, so people know where to go next.

Comments: 3