Entirely predictably, the Downing Street Twitter channel broke new ground at some time on Friday night, registering its 100,000th follower. To put this extraordinary growth in some perspective: one month ago, they had just 12,000. And just one week ago, they had 50,000. In relative terms, for now at least, they're now comfortably settled into Twitterholic's top 30 - ahead of MC Hammer, ahead of Philip Schofield, far ahead of Chris Moyles, and far, far ahead of Russell Brand (sorry Guido).
There seem to be two streams of criticism of Twitter, in terms of 'serious' usage: one, there's no evidence of any tangible benefit (see Thomas Gensemer in the Guardian this week); and two, there's no evidence of a Twitter business model. (Yet and yet, of course.)
Personally, I take a more positive view. Very few MPs have serious numbers of followers - there are only two political offices in the world with any kind of substantial Twitter following: Barack Obama and 10 Downing Street. The former didn't do too badly out of it, did he? - although if you look back at the Obama tweeting, it's frankly a bit rubbish. My guess is, it helped further his image as being hip to this sort of thing, and that was enough. Number10, meanwhile, do a surprising amount at a micro level - you might be surprised how many replies they send to ordinary punters, to their surprise and (often) delight.
And you know what? Even if there's no future business model, we're looking at a phenomenal opportunity here, today. The fact it may not be here tomorrow shouldn't stop us exploiting it while it's there. 100,000 people have signed up - actively, voluntarily - to hear from the heart of UK government. Now they're actually listening, what should we be saying to them?
No10 petitions are now at 9,647,567 email confirmed signatures. But that's SOO 2006
I think that it may have something to do with 10 Downing Street now being auto-opt-in as part of the Twitter account creation process.
Missed it - so I question this statement:
"100,000 people have signed up - actively, voluntarily - to hear from the heart of UK government. Now they're actually listening, what should we be saying to them?"
(Sorry)
[...] That’s a lot, and an achievement not to be underestimated. It has been noted by a number of sites. The excellent Simon Dickson at Puffbox suggests that this is active interest in politics: [...]
[...] be underestimated. It has been noted by a number of sites. The excellent Simon Dickson at Puffbox suggests that this is active interest in politics: Even if there’s no future business model, we’re looking at a phenomenal opportunity [...]