Version three recognises the primary use case of the key target audience (me): mostly on my mobile. And having just got my hands on a new T-Mobile G1 Googlephone, it seemed sensible to make the design work best in that context. So I've recoded the pages to give b-i-g touchscreen-friendly clickable areas, and applied some conditional code to select appropriate styling for the G1 and (as best I can) the iPhone. If you're on something else, including a desktop browser, you'll still get more or less the v2 design.

I've abandoned the filtering options, as it didn't seem people were using them anyway. So now the site concentrates solely on its 'homepage' presentation of the latest 20 items from the political blogs considered by our editorial board (me again) to be the most prominent and influential. Updating is lightning fast, usually within a few minutes of an article's publication, as it's powered by feeds from Google Reader.

If anyone's got an iPhone, could you try it out for me, and let me know how well it matches? I've tried to follow the Apple guidance, as far as I could be bothered anyway; and testiphone.com has been helpful (when used in conjunction with Firefox's User Agent Switcher plugin).

PS: Quick Android tip. I've only seen it advertised on 18-month contracts, with no charge for the handset; but I got mine in a T-Mobile store on a 12-month contract for a £49.99 payment. I don't know about you, but 18 months is a l-o-n-g time to be locked in.

I’m finding myself looking at onepolitics during quiet moments through the day, purely to see what’s popping up. I’m kind of interested in this sort of content generally, but not enough to want to be disturbed by every new item popping up in my RSS reader.

I've found it really useful, so much so that I wanted it to give me more than the fairly restrictive content it offered. I was also noticing the limitations of the initial build, based on WordPress and the FeedWordPress plugin; and at the same time, realising the awesome power of pure RSS. Plus, with more political content going into YouTube, I wanted to add a video element.

So in the last day or two, I've rebuilt onepolitics, dropping WordPress - see? it isn't the answer to everything! - and driving everything through RSS feeds aggregated using shared labels in Google Reader. It now includes full representation of MainStreamMedia and 'true' bloggers. It should be faster to update, with the latest items appearing within five minutes of publication. It also includes an Ajax-style 'video player', showing the latest video clips from the parties' official YouTube accounts. There are a few cute new design touches. The only flipside is, I've dropped the archive aspects... but looking at the usage stats, nobody was using anything other than the 'latest' list anyway.

The code is almost embarrassingly straightforward: it even relies on an old-school FRAMESET, for goodness sake. But it made things much easier to put together, particularly from a cross-browser perspective, and I've used a few presentational tricks to smooth the usability.

As before, it's there if you want it. It helps me keep on top of what's happening on the political blogs, and if it helps you too... great.

• Plaid Cymru are on Twitter. Only a token effort, and only 9 mates. But it's a start. (And its bilingual.) To their credit, they've also got presences on YouTube, Facebook and Flickr (details here).
• The SNP don't seem to have a YouTube presence. Seems odd, when they were among the first to get into it. (Anyone know of it?)
• One thing the SNP do have, and it makes me a little uncomfortable, is a News Aggregator on their main party site. Why uncomfortable? Because it's effectively just republishing an RSS feed from www.scotland.gov.uk (using Drupal's built-in aggregation tool, by the look of it). Yet another blurring of the line between government and politics... and very awkward, where independence is an important characteristic (eg National Statistics stuff).
• and most worrying of all... if you look for the site of Ian Paisley Peter Robinson's DUP, and you happen to be running Google's Desktop search app, you get presented with this.

There's no doubt that, if a political story is out there, PoliticsHome has it in here, somewhere. Most of it is well-intentioned: the whole 'live reporting' aspect, a few 'ticker' areas, a nice grouping of the various sources' coverage of the day's big stories, a diary, a bit of story categorisation. A couple of ideas look familiar - the 'newspaper front pages' is a direct lift from my work at Sky News, for example.

But it looks like an ugly big database, more like a stock market terminal than a 'super blog', or an online magazine / newspaper. It's hard to imagine a less engaging design; maybe they don't consider that a priority. But having brought some famous faces on board, such as Andrew Rawnsley and former BBC man Nick Assinder, I'm surprised not to see them making more of the faces and their original material.

The idea of scrolling 100 items horizontally, in the window at the top of each page, is ludicrous; it's utterly unusable. I've got a few issues with the technicals too: some page elements seem to refresh randomly, then there's a brutal full-page refresh if you leave it five minutes. Quite simply, there are better ways these days.

I fear PoliticsHome has miscalculated. Politics is increasingly about personality, warmth and engagement. That's why the blogs' visitor numbers are growing (regardless of the accuracy of the specific figures). But PoliticsHome feels cold, functional and soulless. I don't expect to use it.

First there was a job advert for 'well paid part-time shifts' on the Work for an MP site, withdrawn early due to a high number of applicants. Now there's an ad on the Guardian site, offering a salary of around £40k for a 'Daily Editor to manage the newsroom and head up its website coverage'. But crucially, the ad notes, the site 'does not produce its own content.'

Promises of a February launch look a bit optimistic now. But there's clearly a lot of money going into this - and it had better be good, very good. Because in a matter of a couple of days, and using fairly straightforward technology, I produced a website which (if you don't mind me saying) does a more than reasonable job of providing a 'portal to the ongoing political debate'. Granted, onepolitics makes no attempt to offer a qualitative commentary on individual posts... but it could, if anyone fancies helping me construct a business model?

In essence, it's an RSS aggregator for people who don't get RSS. I realised I'd written too many posts looking forward to the day when RSS would go mainstream - and it still shows very little sign of happening imminently. And all the while, I'm talking to public sector people for whom RSS is several evolutionary steps away. I've written quite lengthy explainers, covering the concept and the technicals, on the new site itself... so I won't duplicate my efforts here. Suffice to say, it's WordPress. But you all knew that already.

onepolitics is the first fruit of my promise to give myself some Google-style '20 per cent time'; a project with a loose connection to my work, but no direct commercial application. But I'm starting to wonder if it might be of interest to clients. Press offices or stakeholder managers, maybe, who don't yet have any kind of blog monitoring strategy. We could be pulling in any kind of RSS feed; and could be indexing them, or just listing them (as with the 'meanwhile in the blogosphere' box on the homepage). Even better, it's almost entirely automated, updating in the background as often as you like.

It's also making me wonder if there's a need for a bridge between casual web surfing, with zero commitment to the site or subject; and the 'need to know' hunger for RSS subscriptions. I'm finding myself looking at onepolitics during quiet moments through the day, purely to see what's popping up. I'm kind of interested in this sort of content generally, but not enough to want to be disturbed by every new item popping up in my RSS reader.

I'm making no promises about onepolitics. It is what it is, for now anyway. Please have a play with it, and tell me what you think. There are a couple of glitches I know about, and can't really justify fixing, so don't get too pedantic please.