<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Puffbox.com &#187; microsites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://puffbox.com/tag/microsites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://puffbox.com</link>
	<description>Adventures in government, politics and open source. Mostly WordPress-related.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:08:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsites make perfect</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2009/11/18/microsites-make-perfect/</link>
		<comments>http://puffbox.com/2009/11/18/microsites-make-perfect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[e-government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephgray]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/?p=1207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steph Gray drew my attention to a piece highlighting the downside of microsites, and offered a nicely balanced view of the pros and cons. But whilst I admit to a commercial interest here, he missed one strong reason in favour of allowing at least the occasional microsite. I know it flies in the face of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/2009/11/why-do-people-want-microsites/">Steph Gray drew</a> my attention to a piece highlighting the <a href="http://www.socialmediatoday.com/SMC/142781">downside of microsites</a>, and offered a nicely balanced view of the pros and cons. But whilst I admit to a commercial interest here, he missed one strong reason in favour of allowing at least the occasional microsite.</p>
<p>I know it flies in the face of web rationalisation; but <strong>the only way to get better at building websites is to build websites</strong>.</p>
<p>I'm unquestionably better at this job than I was when I started a couple of years ago. I learn something with every new project, and every fresh set of client requirements. I always consciously try to add something new and innovative - for me, or for government, or for WordPress - into every build. If it works, I'll do it again next time; if not, I'll certainly be wiser for trying.</p>
<p>If you adhere to the 'only one website per government department' rule, that would mean your team is only building one website every 3-5 years, or maybe even more. No opportunity to practice or experiment in between monster projects; and the experience of 'last time' will, in all likelihood, be irrelevant. Any mistakes you make, you'll be stuck with for the v-e-r-y long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://puffbox.com/2009/11/18/microsites-make-perfect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
