<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Puffbox.com &#187; interconnectit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://puffbox.com/tag/interconnectit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://puffbox.com</link>
	<description>Adventures in government, politics and open source. Mostly WordPress-related.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:22:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Telegraph moves its blogs to WordPress</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2009/06/25/telegraph-moves-its-blogs-to-wordpress/</link>
		<comments>http://puffbox.com/2009/06/25/telegraph-moves-its-blogs-to-wordpress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interconnectit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/?p=966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's a sign of how far WordPress has come, that I find myself noting the Telegraph's transfer of its blogging platform to WordPress purely because I feel I should... and not because it's especially exciting. I mean, if you were going to set up a large-scale public blogging community, why on earth wouldn't you use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's a sign of how far WordPress has come, that I find myself noting the Telegraph's transfer of its blogging platform to WordPress purely because I feel I <em>should</em>... and not because it's especially exciting. I mean, if you were going to set up a large-scale public blogging community, why on earth <em>wouldn't</em> you use the world-leading, zero-price tag product?</p>
<p>The <del datetime="2009-06-25T08:12:13+00:00">newspaper</del> media group's new blogs editor, <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100000735/welcome-to-the-new-telegraph-blogs/">Damian Thompson is buzzing</a> with excitement at the potential which this move opens up. Among the 'immediate benefits' he highlights: faster operation, easier commenting, better integration with the wider site, even a Twitter element. (I'd add a few others myself, all available instantly with a bit of URL hacking.) But he's right to recognise that the switch won't be immediately popular - and guess what, the majority of the 200+ comments on his introduction post aren't positive. Yeah, we've all been there.</p>
<p>Most of the work, I understand, was done by the Telegraph's in-house team, with some assistance from my fellow <a href="http://wordcamp.org.uk/en/">WordCamp</a>ers (and technically, I suppose, competitors) <a href="http://www.interconnectit.com/">InterconnectIT</a>. The firm's director, Dave Coveney says they're already working with another newspaper group and a magazine publisher. He's clearly seeing the same <a href="http://twitter.com/davecoveney/status/2312652175">momentum</a> I am; there's certainly no shortage of interest in WordPress just now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://puffbox.com/2009/06/25/telegraph-moves-its-blogs-to-wordpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress: reclaiming the web</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2009/02/11/wordpress-reclaiming-web/</link>
		<comments>http://puffbox.com/2009/02/11/wordpress-reclaiming-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interconnectit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/?p=713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm suddenly receiving a lot of email (and other online communication) from people in the public sector, and indeed outside, who want to talk WordPress. And I'm not alone: Dave Coveney, from Liverpool-based consultancy InterconnectIT tweeted yesterday: The professionalisation of #wordpress appears to have finally arrived. We no longer sell websites that happen to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_718" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-718" title="wptattoo" src="http://p2010.puffbox.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/wptattoo.jpg" alt="wptattoo" width="500" height="167" /><p class="wp-caption-text">I love WP as much as the next guy. Unless this is the next guy. pics: bakershours.com</p></div>
<p>I'm suddenly receiving a lot of email (and other online communication) from people in the public sector, and indeed outside, who want to talk <a href="http://wordpress.org">WordPress</a>. And I'm not alone: Dave Coveney, from Liverpool-based consultancy <a href="http://www.interconnectit.com/">InterconnectIT</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/davecoveney/status/1196192078">tweeted</a> yesterday:</p>
<blockquote><p>The professionalisation of #wordpress appears to have finally arrived. We no longer sell websites that happen to be WP, but <em>because </em>of WP.</p></blockquote>
<p>So what's happened to raise WordPress to the status of 'credible alternative'? It almost feels like a stupid question - <em>'why are people turning away from big-money consultancies charging six-figure sums, in favour of rapidly developed, more flexible, more usable solutions that deliver in weeks for a relative pittance?'</em> But bear with me.</p>
<p>If I looked narrowly at the public sector, I could suggest a few milestones which might have led us here: <a href="http://puffbox.com/?tag=downingstreet+wordpress">Number10's precedent-setting adoption of WordPress</a>, <a href="http://puffbox.com/tag/stephgray/">Steph Gray's work</a> at DIUS (and the use of the <a href="http://puffbox.com/2009/02/01/steph-gray-commentariat-wordpress-theme/">Commentariat theme</a> on the <a href="http://poit.cabinetoffice.gov.uk">Power Of Information document</a> in particular), the general acceptance of blogging post-<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/">Peston</a> as serious communication, my own relentless evangelism maybe. Perhaps the combination of all the above. Or perhaps it's as simple as the modest price tag, and the time of year - it doesn't <em>feel</em> like end-of-financial-year spending sprees, but I could be wrong.</p>
<p>None of which explains the surge in private sector interest though. Maybe it's increasing cost-consciousness, or the smoothness of the version 2.7 interface, or the mere fact that 'this stuff is cool'.</p>
<p><em>But you know what?</em> It doesn't matter. The message is getting through, and the cause is being furthered. It really feels like we're getting somewhere, taking the web back from the Big Ugly Consultancies. It's a good feeling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://puffbox.com/2009/02/11/wordpress-reclaiming-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

