<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BNP&#039;s BuddyPress-based social network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://puffbox.com/2009/11/24/bnp-buddypress-social-networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://puffbox.com/2009/11/24/bnp-buddypress-social-networking/</link>
	<description>Adventures in government, politics and open source. Mostly WordPress-related.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:55:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Bennett</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2009/11/24/bnp-buddypress-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-1176</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/?p=1216#comment-1176</guid>
		<description>Yes, I can confirm it was all deliberate, but I never copied Obama - I just took a little inspiration from it. Scouts Honour!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I can confirm it was all deliberate, but I never copied Obama - I just took a little inspiration from it. Scouts Honour!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Pack</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2009/11/24/bnp-buddypress-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/?p=1216#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>It’s true that if you look at traffic to just the central party domains, and their subdomains, then the BNP site is the most popular. But – to take the example of the Liberal Democrats – libdems.org.uk and its subdomains are only part of our “national” web presence and actually only a small part of our overall web presence. At national, regional and local level we have literally hundreds of sites in total that are not part of libdems.org.uk. Their total traffic is several times greater than that to libdems.org.uk. By contrast, the BNP’s website traffic is overwhelmingly concentrated on that domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s true that if you look at traffic to just the central party domains, and their subdomains, then the BNP site is the most popular. But – to take the example of the Liberal Democrats – libdems.org.uk and its subdomains are only part of our “national” web presence and actually only a small part of our overall web presence. At national, regional and local level we have literally hundreds of sites in total that are not part of libdems.org.uk. Their total traffic is several times greater than that to libdems.org.uk. By contrast, the BNP’s website traffic is overwhelmingly concentrated on that domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

