<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Tory site completes the set</title>
	<atom:link href="http://puffbox.com/2008/10/01/new-tory-site-completes-the-set/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://puffbox.com/2008/10/01/new-tory-site-completes-the-set/</link>
	<description>Simon Dickson blogs about online news, e-government and the New Politics. Some important people read it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:55:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2008/10/01/new-tory-site-completes-the-set/#comment-1813</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/?p=419#comment-1813</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like it - there&#039;s litle there that is new or that clever.  Labour at least offer some very cool tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't like it - there's litle there that is new or that clever.  Labour at least offer some very cool tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Worth</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2008/10/01/new-tory-site-completes-the-set/#comment-1803</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Worth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/?p=419#comment-1803</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s certainly cost a lot of cash, and it&#039;s an improvement on the previous one... I do wonder where their branding is going though - the tree logo is now far from prominent.

It&#039;s better than Labour&#039;s site, but then it would be hard for it not to be...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's certainly cost a lot of cash, and it's an improvement on the previous one... I do wonder where their branding is going though - the tree logo is now far from prominent.</p>
<p>It's better than Labour's site, but then it would be hard for it not to be...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
