<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How many Directgov sites?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://puffbox.com/2008/02/11/how-many-directgov-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://puffbox.com/2008/02/11/how-many-directgov-sites/</link>
	<description>Adventures in government, politics and open source. Mostly WordPress-related.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 16:17:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Directionlessgov</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2008/02/11/how-many-directgov-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Directionlessgov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/2008/02/11/how-many-directgov-sites/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>As someone who has been involved in migrating a stand-alone site into Directgov I believe that while some subdomains may exist to aid campaign promotion I would argue most are actually &quot;white-labelled&quot; externally hosted pages that simply can&#039;t be replicated on the Directgov infrastructure at present. Of course with £30m coming Directgov&#039;s way this year it may well only be a matter of time if the will or expertise remains post-migration.

I&#039;ll leave the benefits/efficiencies (or lack thereof) for others to discuss...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who has been involved in migrating a stand-alone site into Directgov I believe that while some subdomains may exist to aid campaign promotion I would argue most are actually "white-labelled" externally hosted pages that simply can't be replicated on the Directgov infrastructure at present. Of course with £30m coming Directgov's way this year it may well only be a matter of time if the will or expertise remains post-migration.</p>
<p>I'll leave the benefits/efficiencies (or lack thereof) for others to discuss...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Gould</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2008/02/11/how-many-directgov-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/2008/02/11/how-many-directgov-sites/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>There are plenty of good reasons why sub-domains might exist. For instance for campaigns or specific audiences. Don&#039;t think they necessarily exist because of the underlying functionality of the platform, and it doesn&#039;t contradict the convergence / rationalisation ethos as far as I can see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are plenty of good reasons why sub-domains might exist. For instance for campaigns or specific audiences. Don't think they necessarily exist because of the underlying functionality of the platform, and it doesn't contradict the convergence / rationalisation ethos as far as I can see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

