<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Puffbox.com &#187; twitterfeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://puffbox.com/tag/twitterfeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://puffbox.com</link>
	<description>Adventures in government, politics and open source. Mostly WordPress-related.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:41:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tories hit Twitter; where&#039;s Labour?</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2008/04/02/tories-hit-twitter-wheres-labour/</link>
		<comments>http://puffbox.com/2008/04/02/tories-hit-twitter-wheres-labour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Dickson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downingstreet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labourparty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libdems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitterfeed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/2008/04/02/tories-hit-twitter-wheres-labour/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It really is Twitter week in Westminster. Barely ten days after the first MP began tweeting, and only a week after Number 10, the @Conservatives have launched an official channel - although so far, it's precisely the one-way Twitterfeed-powered channel we all expected @DowningStreet to be (but wasn't). Likely to be more interesting is @conhome, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really is Twitter week in Westminster. Barely ten days after the first MP began tweeting, and only a week after Number 10, the <a href="http://twitter.com/conservatives/">@Conservatives</a> have launched an official channel - although so far, it's precisely the one-way Twitterfeed-powered channel we all expected <a href="http://twitter.com/downingstreet/">@DowningStreet</a> to be (but wasn't).</p>
<p>Likely to be more interesting is <a href="http://twitter.com/conhome/">@conhome</a>, the Twitter feed of the influential <a href="http://www.conservativehome.com">ConservativeHome</a> website. It's being written as a joint effort by the look of it, with identified authors: not a normal way to run a Twitter channel, but more likely to generate two-way tweeting, I guess.</p>
<p>Meanwhile there's no stopping LibDem Lynne Featherstone, who started all this: she's even been <a href="http://twitter.com/lfeatherstone/statuses/780910937">tweeting from the benches</a> of the House of Commons chamber. And of course, her LibDem mates first tweeted back in May 2007, with an experimental election night service. The account is <a href="http://twitter.com/libdems">still active</a>, with occasional alerts.</p>
<p>All of which brings us back to the age-old question of the <a href="http://www.labour.org.uk">Labour Party</a>'s general underperformance in new media. <a href="http://twitter.com/labour/">@Labour</a> does exist, but it's the <a href="http://www.labour.ie">Irish Labour Party</a>. I've guessed at a bunch of possible Twitter IDs which Labour HQ might use; and all are still coming up as unregistered. Hey, even a basic Twitterfeed-powered channel would be a sensible starting point, and a defensive claim of the best ID.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px"><strong><font color="#ff0000">BREAKING NEWS</font></strong>: Looks like there's movement on the Twitter front. <a href="http://twitter.com/uklabour">@uklabour</a> is now pumping out Twitterfeed-powered updates from various sources. Thanks to Paul in the comments (below).</p>
<p>Instead, Labour seems to have been putting its efforts into a <a href="http://www.labour.org.uk/">special homepage</a> for its local election efforts. It has a campaign blog whose <a href="http://feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.labour.org.uk%2Flocal_elections%3FFeedId%3DNTlmOGIzODQtM2YyNy0xNDk0LWUxNzUtMzZjMzczNzVhMTdi">RSS feed doesn't know</a> what character set it's sending, and thinks an appropriate story description is the first four words. There's a box to make an online donation, which asks for your name and a donation amount, then seems to do nothing sensible with them. It's terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://puffbox.com/2008/04/02/tories-hit-twitter-wheres-labour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No10 now on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2008/03/27/no10-now-on-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://puffbox.com/2008/03/27/no10-now-on-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Dickson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[e-government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downingstreet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitterfeed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/2008/03/27/no10-now-on-twitter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There isn't much to see there yet, but 10 Downing Street has just opened an official Twitter account. Like a lot of corporate presences, it's based - in these initial stages at least - on their existing RSS output, and the free Twitterfeed web service. But I had a very interesting chat this afternoon with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There isn't much to see there yet, but <a href="http://www.pm.gov.uk">10 Downing Street</a> has just opened an <a href="http://twitter.com/downingstreet">official Twitter account</a>. Like a lot of corporate presences, it's based - in these initial stages at least - on their existing RSS output, and the free <a href="http://www.twitterfeed.com/">Twitterfeed</a> web service. But I had a very interesting chat this afternoon with No10's new head of digital... and he's eagerly exploring what they might do next.</p>
<p>Just as interesting: I think <a href="http://twitter.com/simond/statuses/778055894">I 'broke the story'</a> when I mentioned it to my own (relatively) select band of Twitter contacts. I was subscriber no3. Two hours later, we're up to 23. Word travels fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://puffbox.com/2008/03/27/no10-now-on-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

