<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Puffbox.com &#187; livejournal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://puffbox.com/tag/livejournal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://puffbox.com</link>
	<description>Adventures in government, politics and open source. Mostly WordPress-related.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:20:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Another national newspaper goes WordPress</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2010/06/09/another-national-newspaper-goes-wordpress/</link>
		<comments>http://puffbox.com/2010/06/09/another-national-newspaper-goes-wordpress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 08:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[livejournal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/?p=2075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to note that the Independent has switched its blogs from Livejournal to WordPress. Why? According to online editor Martin King, there was a simple reason for the move: 'to make them better.' Clearly a man after my own heart. He writes: 'We are demonstrating that globally standard programs can free mainstream journalism from the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to note that the Independent has switched its blogs from Livejournal to WordPress. Why? <a href="http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2010/06/08/why-have-we-changed-the-blogs-at-independent-co-uk/">According to online editor Martin King</a>, there was a simple reason for the move: 'to make them better.' Clearly a man after my own heart.</p>
<p>He writes: 'We are demonstrating that globally standard programs can free mainstream journalism from the complex bespoke set-ups of the past.' And his colleague Jack Riley <a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/539052.php">tells Journalism.co.uk</a>: 'WordPress is infinitely more customisable, which means that we can adapt it all as we go along. By bringing it all in-house it also means our development and editorial teams can work closely on getting the features that readers and bloggers want live as quickly as possible.'</p>
<p>I must admit, I <a href="http://puffbox.com/2008/11/27/independent-minds-livejournal/">always had my suspicions</a> that the Independent's former arrangement with LiveJournal was driven primarily by the personalities involved, former Downing St colleagues Ben Wegg Prosser and Jimmy Leach (now <a href="http://puffbox.com/2009/11/24/jimmy-leach-fco/">back in Whitehall</a>, of course).</p>
<p>Worth mentioning too that the Telegraph has gone deeper into WordPress just recently, with the migration of its <a href="http://my.telegraph.co.uk/aboutus/">My Telegraph user community</a>. Its blogs.telegraph.co.uk site, for journalists and commentators, moved over to WP <a href="http://puffbox.com/2009/06/25/telegraph-moves-its-blogs-to-wordpress/">about a year ago</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://puffbox.com/2010/06/09/another-national-newspaper-goes-wordpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Independent launches blogging platform</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2008/11/27/independent-minds-livejournal/</link>
		<comments>http://puffbox.com/2008/11/27/independent-minds-livejournal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[e-government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downingstreet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[livejournal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robertpeston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/?p=522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Independent's new blogging platform, Independent Minds, launched yesterday in a partnership with the now Russian-owned Livejournal. But unlike the Telegraph's MyTelegraph site, it puts the journalists' blogs on the same platform as the readers'. It's a dramatic improvement (as you'd expect) on the very clunky, and frankly half-hearted blogging efforts they were doing on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">Independent</a>'s new blogging platform, Independent Minds, launched yesterday in a partnership with the now Russian-owned Livejournal. But unlike the Telegraph's MyTelegraph site, it puts the journalists' blogs on the same platform as the readers'. It's a dramatic improvement (as you'd expect) on the very clunky, and frankly half-hearted blogging efforts they were doing <a href="http://blogs.independent.co.uk/">on Typepad</a>; and they also promise a strategic decision to 'centre more on the writer than on the topic' as they did before. The blogging content gets some high-profile space on the Indy's homepage.</p>
<p>On the face of it, it's a fairly basic re-skinning of <a href="http://www.livejournal.com/community/">Livejournal's community features</a>; the deeper you click, the less it feels like an Independent site, and the more it feels like plain old Livejournal. Nothing wrong with that; it makes sense to use a well-established and relatively beginner-friendly platform. It's a natural move for Livejournal as the new owners are reportedly keen to expand their relatively modest UK user base: their <a href="http://www.livejournal.com/stats.bml">statistics page</a> shows they have 315,000 UK-based users.</p>
<p>Hmm... the Independent? Livejournal? There wouldn't be a <a href="http://www.number10.gov.uk">Downing Street</a> connection there, would there? Former No10 web boss <a href="http://jimmyleach.independentminds.livejournal.com/">Jimmy Leach</a> is now the Indy's 'editorial director for digital'; and <a href="http://wpbenjamin.livejournal.com">Ben Wegg-Prosser</a>, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4723971.stm">ex-head of the Strategic Communications Unit</a> is Director of Corporate Development at Livejournal's Russian owners, <a href="http://www.sup.com/en/">SUP</a>. The two also worked together for ages at the Guardian (I think).</p>
<p>It's another signal of blogging's steady progress into the newsroom: speaking of which, it's well worth reading BBC man <a href="http://jemstone.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/why-robert-peston-blogs/">Jem Stone's write-up</a> of Robert Peston's talk to the BBC's College of Journalism yesterday. 'Central to everything that I do at the BBC,' he says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://puffbox.com/2008/11/27/independent-minds-livejournal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
