<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Puffbox.com &#187; breakingnews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://puffbox.com/tag/breakingnews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://puffbox.com</link>
	<description>Adventures in government, politics and open source. Mostly WordPress-related.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:41:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>BBC &#8216;news jockey&#8217; experiment</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2011/11/10/bbc-news-jockey-experiment/</link>
		<comments>http://puffbox.com/2011/11/10/bbc-news-jockey-experiment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Dickson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breakingnews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toldyouso]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/?p=3111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Steve Herrmann, writing on the BBC News Editors blog yesterday: During the past few years the "live page" format has become a regular feature of our coverage around big breaking stories. The format has been a big success in terms of usage, so we're thinking about what more we could do with it. We [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Steve Herrmann, writing <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2011/11/live_coverage_on_bbc_news_onli.html">on the BBC News Editors blog yesterday</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>During the past few years the "live page" format has become a regular feature of our coverage around big breaking stories. The format has been a big success in terms of usage, so we're thinking about what more we could do with it. We think the pages are not necessarily just about breaking news - they are also a real-time showcase of the best of what we (and others) are doing.</p></blockquote>
<p>By me, writing <a href="http://puffbox.com/2007/07/09/my-ideas-for-breaking-news-blogs/">in July 2007</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>A 'breaking news blog', in my book, should look and feel more like Twitter. Activate it when a huge story breaks - maybe only a couple of times a year, maybe a couple of times a month. Short snaps of maybe only a couple of lines, written in an informal tone. Pretend you're MSN-ing a friend. Be prepared to be vague - read between the lines if necessary, and don't be shy about getting it wrong. Stream of consciousness, if you like, and proud of it. I haven't yet seen any news organisation doing this systematically... but if they have any business in breaking news, then they should be.</p>
<p>I've also got an early idea for a 'news jockey' role, writing a running commentary on the day's news blog-style. The USA Today thing is probably the closest comparison, but I'm thinking of something slightly different. It calls for a certain style of writing, and a certain style of writer, but I think it could be a winner.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://puffbox.com/2011/11/10/bbc-news-jockey-experiment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking news blogs (again)</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2008/01/31/breaking-news-blogs-again/</link>
		<comments>http://puffbox.com/2008/01/31/breaking-news-blogs-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Dickson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breakingnews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/2008/01/31/breaking-news-blogs-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alfred Hermida, ex BBC, now Assistant Professor at the University of British Columbia's school of journalism, makes an interesting suggestion: using the new WordPress Twitter-style 'Prologue' theme as a breaking news site, 'with reporters adding the latest details as they come in'. I actually suggested something identical to this, back in July: 'A ‘breaking news [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alfredhermida.com/">Alfred Hermida</a>, ex BBC, now Assistant Professor at the University of British Columbia's school of journalism, makes an <a href="http://reportr.net/2008/01/30/create-a-breaking-news-site-in-minutes-with-wordpress/">interesting suggestion</a>: using the <a href="http://puffbox.com/2008/01/29/wordpress-meets-twitter/">new WordPress Twitter-style 'Prologue' theme</a> as a breaking news site, 'with reporters adding the latest details as they come in'.</p>
<p>I actually suggested something identical to this, <a href="http://simondickson.wordpress.com/2007/07/09/my-ideas-for-breaking-news-blogs/">back in July</a>: 'A ‘breaking news blog’, in my book, should look and feel more like Twitter. Activate it when a huge story breaks - maybe only a couple of times a year, maybe a couple of times a month. Short snaps of maybe only a couple of lines, written in an informal tone.' <em>Wish I'd followed it through, now.</em></p>
<p>If I were running a news operation right now, I'd have a WordPress installation quietly stashed somewhere offsite, ready to go. It's so many advantages: emergency capacity in the event of a site meltdown, instant activation (by the newsroom, not the IT team) when required, and a more natural 'breaking news' style. When you get another 9/11, it could be as simple as switching the DNS for your main site.</p>
<p><em>By the way...</em> did I really hear a BBC interviewer utter the words 'people look at the World Trade Center very differently after 9/11' the other day? Yes: they used to look up, now they don't. That's pretty different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://puffbox.com/2008/01/31/breaking-news-blogs-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

