<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congratulations @downingstreet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://puffbox.com/2009/07/20/twitter-downingstreet-million/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://puffbox.com/2009/07/20/twitter-downingstreet-million/</link>
	<description>Adventures in government, politics and open source. Mostly WordPress-related.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:55:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2009/07/20/twitter-downingstreet-million/comment-page-1/#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/?p=1011#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>Hmm... Inevitably I suppose, it&#039;s going to &lt;em&gt;feel&lt;/em&gt; a little bit closer to &#039;politics&#039; than other things, because the No10 staff is there to serve and cover the Prime Minister and nothing else. Some of those involved on the web stuff have an explicit Labour background, others don&#039;t - or keep it very quiet if they do.

In all fairness, I think they do an exemplary job of walking that tightrope. But yes, when we get a change of government, it&#039;ll be fascinating to see how the transition works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm... Inevitably I suppose, it's going to <em>feel</em> a little bit closer to 'politics' than other things, because the No10 staff is there to serve and cover the Prime Minister and nothing else. Some of those involved on the web stuff have an explicit Labour background, others don't - or keep it very quiet if they do.</p>
<p>In all fairness, I think they do an exemplary job of walking that tightrope. But yes, when we get a change of government, it'll be fascinating to see how the transition works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wardman</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2009/07/20/twitter-downingstreet-million/comment-page-1/#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wardman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/?p=1011#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>&gt;Moreso than any other civil service comms project, Matt?

I&#039;d suggest that it would be one of the more difficult to get right (or one of the easier ones to get wrong?), since I&#039;d describe the No 10 site and Twitter feed as being far closer to &quot;politics and policy presentation&quot; than most other government sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Moreso than any other civil service comms project, Matt?</p>
<p>I'd suggest that it would be one of the more difficult to get right (or one of the easier ones to get wrong?), since I'd describe the No 10 site and Twitter feed as being far closer to "politics and policy presentation" than most other government sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2009/07/20/twitter-downingstreet-million/comment-page-1/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/?p=1011#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>Moreso than any other civil service comms project, Matt? Strictly speaking, of course, it should continue regardless of any future change of government. There shouldn&#039;t even be a requirement - or even an expectation - of a website redesign for number10.gov.uk. In theory anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moreso than any other civil service comms project, Matt? Strictly speaking, of course, it should continue regardless of any future change of government. There shouldn't even be a requirement - or even an expectation - of a website redesign for number10.gov.uk. In theory anyway...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wardman</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2009/07/20/twitter-downingstreet-million/comment-page-1/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wardman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/?p=1011#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>Correct.

The fascinating thing is what happens with a change of government.

The feeling I get is that it has been quite well managed to transfer as an institutional rather than political channel.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct.</p>
<p>The fascinating thing is what happens with a change of government.</p>
<p>The feeling I get is that it has been quite well managed to transfer as an institutional rather than political channel.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

