<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Governance of Britain relaunched</title>
	<atom:link href="http://puffbox.com/2008/06/26/governance-of-britain-relaunched/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://puffbox.com/2008/06/26/governance-of-britain-relaunched/</link>
	<description>Adventures in government, politics and open source. Mostly WordPress-related.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 16:17:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2008/06/26/governance-of-britain-relaunched/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/?p=208#comment-402</guid>
		<description>The idea at the moment is to hack the normal comments form to ask people for a YouTube URL (optional, obviously). If they submit one, we could extrapolate the appropriate embedding code, and show it alongside (or instead of?) a text comment. All would be subject to moderation, of course.

It&#039;s hard enough getting government departments to open themselves up to comments. I just can&#039;t see any official body allowing anarchic inclusion of user-generated content based on tagging. And for once, I&#039;m inclined to agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea at the moment is to hack the normal comments form to ask people for a YouTube URL (optional, obviously). If they submit one, we could extrapolate the appropriate embedding code, and show it alongside (or instead of?) a text comment. All would be subject to moderation, of course.</p>
<p>It's hard enough getting government departments to open themselves up to comments. I just can't see any official body allowing anarchic inclusion of user-generated content based on tagging. And for once, I'm inclined to agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane McCracken</title>
		<link>http://puffbox.com/2008/06/26/governance-of-britain-relaunched/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane McCracken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puffbox.com/?p=208#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Along with many others I&#039;m intrigued what the response would be if a Govt dept said we&#039;ll embed videos/posts with tag XYZ on our site.  Would people bother?  Would they purposely post inappropriate material?

I look forward to seeing what&#039;s possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Along with many others I'm intrigued what the response would be if a Govt dept said we'll embed videos/posts with tag XYZ on our site.  Would people bother?  Would they purposely post inappropriate material?</p>
<p>I look forward to seeing what's possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

